20160718

TROPP, Martin. Images of Fear, how horror histories helped shape modern culture (1818 – 1918). London: McFarland, 1999

TROPP, Martin. Images of Fear, how horror histories helped shape modern culture (1818 – 1918). London: McFarland, 1999. [PR 830 TRO]

Tropp examines how a series of images of “horror” in fiction interacted with an emerging modern culture over a century, shaping attitudes towards such aspects of life as new technology, urban crime and gender relationship – culminating in the recasting of life and death on the Western Front of WWI in the mold of horror story.
The term horror denotes both fantasy and reality. In fiction, it designates are kind of vicarious experience, existing in another realm, dealing with supernatural events and unbelievable characters, that readers approach with the expectation of an escape from the realities of daily experience. At the same time, the darkest of inescapable truths-natural, disasters, human suffering-bears the same label, linked by language.
Gothic fiction contained contradiction, while the means to an innocent escape, it aroused in its Victorian audience fears that lurked beneath the surface, fears connected with the ongoing upheaval of culture discarding a way of life that had been unchanged for centuries and, amid  the social, industrial and scientific revolutions of the 19th century, making a modern world.

(From Walpole to Radcliffe)

The unprecedented success of the gothic novel means that for a vast majority of newly literate, horror tales were the first imaginative fiction read, shaping attitudes not only to literature, but to the act of reading as well.
Unable to afford books like those of Mrs. Radcliffe, theses millions of new readers had to get their thrills, though cheaper sources in ways that blurred the traditional identification of a specific story with a particular book. A whole new industry aroused to serve them by mass marketing the gothic pattern. As a result, the major novels themselves reached their widest circulation only indirectly, filtered through new forms of fiction that preserved the skeleton of the plot while eviscerating the contents.
Sir Walter Scott pointed out that the characters in gothic fiction take on the features of their class and in fact, become more representative of their class than individuals.[On novelists and Fiction, ed Ioan Williams . London: Routledge Ekegan Paul, 1968.]. Class was no longer defined as a synonym of wealth.
Sublime: 18thcentury aesthetics that underlay Gothicism. Scenes that evoke awe, astonishment, terror; sights such as vast landscapes and ruins sounds like, vast cataracts, raging storms, thunder or artillery (Burke, 194) Strong Smells(B.198). Sublime as idea of self-preservation (Burke, 174)
Sublime was an aesthetics construct, a theory of taste, where terror had to be distanced form real experience, proximity destroyed feeling of sublime (Burke,134)

Minerva Press (William Lane)

“Full of typographical errors, printed on coarse yellowish or gray paper in minuscule type, they were constantly condemned in reviews for their overall shoddiness, their wretched paper and imperfect letter carelessly written and printed.” Lane, of course, couldn’t care less since the economies of his method made his books affordable to a less affluent audience, who didn’t seem to mind the condition of the vehicle as long as horror emerged unscathed.
Although his books were cheaper than novels had been, they were still out of reach for many readers.” (p.16)

Before Lane, libraries were for favored few, he solved the problem by organizing and supporting lending libraries; the subscriber for a small periodic sum, could borrow one book to read, the exchange it for another.