20170120

Three pedigrees of Post-Modernism (Art, Theory, History)



3 PEDIGREES OF POST-MODERNISM 
→ Art
                                                                             → Theory
                                                                             → History

Baroque
The crisis of representation:
Technological innovation in the infrastructure (the economic sphere of productive activities that supports/subvert superstructure Marx) had outstripped the superstructure traditions of visual art. Mass production (photo) replaced handcrafted originality (art).
The deeper question: realism depends on a “mirror theory” of knowledge essentially that the mind is the mirror of reality. This view is challenged by painters such as Cézanne (cylinders, spheres, cones → take ahead by Picasso) and Monet who painted not reality but the effect of perceiving it.
Photography merely reproduces reality, while art took a leap in the new Cubist direction. Cubism rescued art from obsolescence and re-established its authority to represent reality in a way that photography could not.
But photography threatened both traditional and avant-garde art in another sense not recognized until 1936 (Benjamin).
The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction = Therefore uniqueness/irreplaceability/ irreproducible. The authority of original works derives from theory that classes them as priceless, irreplaceable objects of art. Benjamin argued that the mechanical reproducibility of original art must have a disintegrating effect on the original itself. Mass reproduction makes it trivial.
From Modern to Postmodern: the modern is always historically at war with what comes immediately before it. The Modern ends up being at war with itself and must become Postmodern. (Modo = now/ Postmodern = after just now) in that sense, Modern is always Postmodern.